Facebook
may pursue a lawsuit against law firms that represented a New York man
who recently turned fugitive rather than face federal charges that he
tried to defraud founder Mark Zuckerberg out of half of the company, a
judge ruled.
New
York Supreme Court Justice Eileen Rakower said Facebook and Zuckerberg
could move forward with a lawsuit alleging law firms, including DLA
Piper LLP and Milberg LLP, maliciously prosecuted claims by Paul Ceglia
that were based on forged documents.
Rakower
said that, accepting Facebook’s claims as true, its complaint
adequately alleged the law firms “knew there was no basis – and
therefore no probable cause- for Ceglia’s claims.”
Facebook
in statement said it was pleaded with the ruling and would “continue to
hold accountable DLA Piper and the other firms who pursued Paul
Ceglia’s fraudulent claims against Facebook.”
A
DLA Piper spokesman did not respond to a request for comment. Milberg’s
lawyer declined comment, and a lawyer for a third firm, Lippes Mathias
Wexler Friedman LLP, did not respond to a request for comment.
The
ruling came a week after what would have been the May 4 start of a
criminal trial in Manhattan federal court of Ceglia, a 41-year-old wood
pellet salesman from Wellsville, New York.
Instead,
Ceglia removed his electronic ankle bracelet in early March and
disappeared, along with his wife, two children and a dog. His
whereabouts remain unknown. The criminal case arose from Ceglia’s June
2010 civil lawsuit in upstate New York against Menlo Park,
California-based Facebook and Zuckerberg.
Ceglia
alleged that a 2003 contract with Zuckerberg, then a Harvard University
freshman who had done programming work for Ceglia’s StreetFax.com,
entitled him to half of Facebook. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
in New York last month upheld the dismissal of that lawsuit, saying
“overwhelming forensic evidence” showed the contract was forged.
Over
the years, the lawsuit was handled by several prominent law firms,
including DLA Piper, one of the largest firms in the world.
Facebook
sued those firms in October, saying they knew or should have known
Ceglia’s lawsuit was a fraud, but plowed ahead “for the purpose of
extorting a lucrative and unwarranted settlement.”
Facebook
also said those lawyers stayed with the case even after a lawyer at
Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman, who also represented Ceglia,
warned he had found “smoking-gun” evidence of fraud. Kasowitz Benson
soon withdrew from the case.
Posted by : Gizmeon
No comments:
Post a Comment