Start small, win quick, then move on to bigger issues.
That
appears to be the European Union’s strategy to pursue Google in a
competition dispute by choosing to push a narrow set of charges around
its shopping service, while opening another investigation of Google’s
Android mobile phone software.
Whether
or not the EU succeeds in branding Google a market-abusing monopolist
in web search – a big if, given that the competition authority has yet
to publish its exact charges – the Internet giant could be pinned down
for years to come in regulatory procedures and legal appeals.
A
drawn-out process is likely to embolden existing and would-be
interlopers to step up assaults on Google’s wide range of businesses, if
the history of Microsoft’s antitrust battles with U.S. and European
regulators is any guide.
In
accusing Google of anti-competitive practices against rival shopping
sites, the EU competition authority said it is continuing to investigate
other areas, including alleged “web scraping” to copy content off of
rival travel and local business review sites, and Google’s restrictive
practices on advertising.
A
quick EU finding that Google has abused its market power by favoring
its own shopping services at the expense of non-Google websites, could
set a precedent for new charges over how it handles hotels, flights and
other services, experts say.
This, in turn, could renew politically charged debates over Google’s tax avoidance moved and privacy safeguards.
“The concern is how broad does this investigation go?” asked Macquarie Securities analyst Ben Schachter, who tracks Google.
Google
readily acknowledges it is the most used search engine in Europe, but
argues that people find information on the Internet via many avenues,
including social media, mobile phone apps, shopping sites and by going
directly to popular sites.
“Allegations
of harm, for consumers and competitors, have proved to be wide of the
mark,” Google said in a statement responding to the European Commission.
“We respectfully but strongly disagree.”
So
far, nothing the EU proposed in its preliminary statement of objections
suggests it is ready to force Google to change its business model, any
hint of which would spook investors and be a threat to its ability to
innovate and compete, analysts say.
“We
see little long-term risk to the business model from regulators,” Baird
Equity Research analyst Colin Sebastian wrote in a note to investors.
More likely, the EU will impose fines or set competitive restrictions on
how Google features its own properties versus those of rivals, he said.
IMPASSE
By
contrast, Microsoft was accused of tying its web browser to its Windows
software monopoly in a bid to dominate the emerging Web era and faced
calls to be split in two in the course of legal battles stretching from
1998 to 2010. That created openings for Internet leaders Google,
Facebook, Apple and Amazon.com to emerge.
It’s
too early to say whether Google faces the same fate as the world moves
beyond computers into the mobile Internet era. Working in Google’s favor
is its control over Android, the software used to power more than 80
percent of all smartphones. That positions it well for the current
shift, but puts it on uncertain ground as the EU starts to probe Android
as well.
EU
Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager has said she wants a change
in the “principle” underlying searches rather than a redesign of
current Web pages or tweaks to algorithms by which Google ranks results.
During
the five-year inquiry leading to the accusations, Google agreed three
times to settlement terms, only to be rebuffed by EU authorities who saw
its proposed changes as too narrow or cosmetic.
This
week’s crackdown on Google drew a chorus of cheers from a handful of
start-up shopping sites that had filed complaints alleging Google
excluded them from its search. They see the EU’s action giving them a
second chance, both in terms of business opportunities and the ability
to attract fresh venture funding.
But
Google’s woes are not likely to help Europe’s burgeoning start-up
scene, in part because Google is an active funder and serial acquirer of
young companies here, but also because most firms count on Google’s
low-cost ads to fund their own services.
Instead,
Google’s bigger opponents including German publisher Axel Springer
(SPRGn.DE) and other European media and telecom firms with more to gain
from having it on the defensive.
GLOVES COME OFF
The
likeliest beneficiaries do not come from Europe at all. They are
well-known, high-tech names that increasingly compete with Google in
what is largely a single, global digital market.
These
include Apple and Samsung (005930.KS) in phones, Amazon.com in
shopping, Facebook and Twitter in social media, and, in software,
Microsoft and Oracle (ORCL.N), two active backers of the EU case against
Google.
Amazon,
Facebook, and Apple share many similar business practices to Google in
terms of favoring their own products over those of competitors, analyst
Sebastian said. Each, in its way, is gaining ground on Google in realms
they control.
But
because none of these rivals have the decisive monopoly market power
that Google has over web search, they don’t, at least so far, face the
same scrutiny from regulators, he says.
Amazon’s
site search uses its own “buy box” to favor either its own inventory or
that of other key partners. Apple’s mobile apps (iTunes, Maps,
AppStore) are installed as default software on its closely controlled
phones and tablets, akin to how Android phones default to Google’s
search, maps and app store.
Facebook
targets advertising using members’ personal details, which gives it a
distinct advantage over other online and offline media companies,
including Google. From nowhere a decade ago, Facebook now ranks second
behind Google in terms of advertising customers, the revenue lifeblood
of both companies. Google has 4 million customers while Facebook has 2
million customers, according to Macquarie analyst Schachter’s estimates.
Facebook
has also begun beefing up its search capabilities, posing a big
challenge to Google by keeping users inside its network instead of going
to the open web, where Google is king.
Google
is now gearing up to allow websites to target ads to their existing
users, using customer email addresses, taking direct aim at a similar
Facebook audience targeting advertising product, analysts say.
Google
may have held off from launching this product to avoid provoking
regulators, which has now happened despite efforts to appease the EU,
said Pivotal Research analyst Brian Wieser.
“Google knows that anything that they want to do is going to met with regulatory scrutiny, so why hold back?” Wieser said.
Posted by : Gizmeon
No comments:
Post a Comment